Follow
Gary Edmond
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Law's looking glass: expert identification evidence derived from photographic and video images
G Edmond, K Biber, R Kemp, G Porter
Current issues in criminal justice 20 (3), 337-377, 2009
1262009
Trashing junk science
G Edmond, D Mercer
Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 3, 1998
1001998
Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners
G Edmond, A Towler, B Growns, G Ribeiro, B Found, D White, ...
Science & Justice 57 (2), 144-154, 2017
852017
Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals
G Edmond, JM Tangen, RA Searston, IE Dror
Law, Probability and Risk 14 (1), 1-25, 2015
832015
Judicial representations of scientific evidence
G Edmond
The Modern Law Review 63 (2), 216-251, 2000
822000
Australian Evidence
A Ligertwood, G Edmond
LexisNexis, 2010
80*2010
The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial’(2012)
G Edmond, M San Roque
Current Issues in Criminal Justice 24, 51, 0
72*
A contextual approach to the admissibility of the state's forensic science and medical evidence
G Edmond, K Roach
University of Toronto Law Journal 61 (3), 343-409, 2011
712011
Conjectures and exhumations: Citations of history, philosophy and sociology of science in US federal courts
G Edmond, D Mercer
Law & Literature 14 (2), 309-366, 2002
642002
Model forensic science
G Edmond, B Found, K Martire, K Ballantyne, D Hamer, R Searston, ...
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 48 (5), 496-537, 2016
612016
After objectivity: expert evidence and procedural reform
G Edmond
Sydney L. Rev. 25, 131, 2003
602003
Procedural fairness, the criminal trial and forensic science and medicine.
G Edmond, A Roberts
TheSYDNEY LAW REVIEW 33 (3), 359-394, 2011
592011
How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers
G Edmond, K Martire, R Kemp, D Hamer, B Hibbert, A Ligertwood, ...
Australian Bar Review 39 (174), 2014
562014
Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate and Judicial Attitudes towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation
G Edmond, D Mercer
Law & Policy 26 (2), 231-257, 2004
562004
Scientific literacy and the jury: reconsidering jurycompetence'
G Edmond, D Mercer
Public Understanding of Science 6 (4), 329, 1997
561997
Admissibility compared: the reception of incriminating expert evidence (ie, forensic science) in four adversarial jurisdictions
G Edmond, S Cole, E Cunliffe, A Roberts
U. Denv. Crim. L. Rev. 3, 31, 2013
552013
Litigation life: Law-science knowledge construction in (Bendectin) mass toxic tort litigation
G Edmond, D Mercer
Social Studies of Science 30 (2), 265-316, 2000
552000
Constructing miscarriages of justice: Misunderstanding scientific evidence in high profile criminal appeals
G Edmond
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (1), 53-89, 2002
542002
Quasi-justice: Ad hoc expertise and identification evidence.
G Edmond, MS Roque
Criminal Law Journal 33 (1), 8-33, 2009
52*2009
Merton and the hot tub: Scientific conventions and expert evidence in Australian civil procedure
G Edmond
Law & Contemp. Probs. 72, 159, 2009
512009
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20